Marginalization and Isolation

This week in class we read three different pieces, "Champion of the World" by Maya Angelou, "Because My Father Said He was the Only Indian who Saw Jimi Hendrix Play 'The Star Spangled Banner' at Woodstock" by Sherman Alexie, and "Fish Cheeks" by Amy Tan. These three narratives all had to do with marginalization and the isolation each author felt from society.
In "Champion of the World", Angelou uses Joe Louis's boxing fight as a symbol for her race's fight against white society. When Louis defeats his white contender, Angelou feels as if it is a win for the entire Black race. For a moment she doesn't feel marginalized anymore. However, at the end Angelou points out that "it wouldn't be fit for a Black man and his family to be caught on a lonely country road". By saying this, she shows she knows that their fight against marginalization is not over.
In Alexie's piece, he talks about how his alcoholic father listened to Jimi Hendrix over and over again. Jimi Hendrix, who was also from a marginalized race, helped Alexie's father deal with the isolation he felt from the rest of society. Sherman Alexie showed how his father dealt with marginalization by taking comfort in those that were also isolated.
Lastly, in "Fish Cheeks", Amy Tan talks about the struggle of coming from a Chinese family but trying to fit in to white society. She is embarrassed by her culture when the minister and his family come to her family's traditional Chinese Christmas dinner. Tan tries to overcome her feelings of isolation by assimilating to the dominant culture. In the end, Tan realizes her foolishness and learns that she needs to be proud of her culture and what makes her different.
Although all these pieces dealt with marginalization, all the authors handled it differently. Showing how marginalization affects everyone in a different way.

Society's Disability

In Nancy Mairs' essay, "Disability" she highlights society's attitude towards disabled people. People think that someone with a disability is only that disability. Mairs aims to disprove this. She talks about how she, like everyone else, "drive[s] a car, talk[s] on the telephone...". By showing that she is just like everyone else, Mairs shows that society separates the disabled for no reason at all. 

Unfortunately, I think society does unknowingly separate handicapped people  For example, my close friend has a brother that is mentally disabled. I don't think anything of it when we are with them, however, I can tell that other people do. When I was in seventh grade, my friend's mom came to pick us up with Alex, her brother. I didn't mind being with him but I noticed that other people were staring. I thought this was sad because it just shows how society isn't accustomed to people with disabilities. Mairs argues that people think that handicapped people are different from the rest of us, and I agree with her. I don't think they should feel isolated just because they have a disability. I think her point was strengthened by the video that Ms. Valentino showed us in class this week.

The video showed the reactions of people to mannequins modeled after people with a handicap. Many stopped to stare, some took photos, while one girl mimicked one of the mannequins. I thought this was kind of sad because it just shows how people think seeing disabled people is strange. They aren't used to seeing disabled people. Unfortunately, Mairs was correct when saying that people with a disability are isolated in society because others can only see the disability, not the person.

Verisimilitude - Langston Hughes

This week we were asked, "What is one theme [Hughes] creates? How does the verisimilitude foster the theme?" In his poems, Langston Hughes was able to show that African American people still face racism and segregation everyday. In one poem, "The Weary Blues", Hughes tells the story in first-person narrative, giving the appearance that he is there "...down on Lenox Avenue the other night". The colloquialisms he uses, "Ain't got nobody but ma self" allows the reader to believe that these black men feel isolated and alone but at the same time places the reader in that time period. In "I, Too, Sing America", Langston Hughes writes optimistically, hoping for a better tomorrow for black people. Again, he creates verisimilitude by placing himself in the situation, writing in first-person, "They'll see how beautiful I am and be ashamed". Lines like these strike the reader as true. They can feel his pain and emotion through his writing and his want for a better life for African Americans. And lastly in "The Negro Speaks of Rivers", Hughes outlines his history. However, instead of alluding to his ancestors directly, Hughes uses words like "I" and "my", writing again in first-person. By creating this verisimilitude that he had been there over all these years, Hughes shows that black people have persevered a lot and that they have gained much knowledge "deep like the rivers". Overall, Langston Hughes used first-person to give the appearance of his presence in each situation. By doing this, the theme of each of his poems is expressed. 

Unfairly Criticized

This week in class we read different literary criticisms about The Great Gatsby. When reading the feminist criticism, although I didn't agree with all her ideas, I found that the author made some valid points. She said, "Literary works often reflect the ideological conflicts of their culture, whether or not it is their intention to do so...". In her essay she pointed out that the women were all alike in The Great Gatsby; they are negatively portrayed as shallow, selfish, and appalling.
The main characters(Daisy, Jordan, and Myrtle) all are considered New Women. The way they dress and the way they act are characteristics of the New Woman. In the 1930s women began wearing skimpier clothing, cutting their hair short, and going to parties and drinking and smoking, etc. Women who did these things were considered "new". Many people were taken aback by this new attitude of women; most didn't like it and resented women who acted this way. F. Scott Fitzgerald's portrayal of the women in the book reflects the time period it was written in. The women, coincidentally, are new women and are also represented as horrible, crude, and egotistical. As the author points out, F. Scott Fitzgerald, whether intentionally or unintentionally, characterizes these women based on the 1930s view of women who acted like they did.
I admit that I didn't like Daisy, Jordan, or Myrtle. However, after reading I'm left reconsidering my first perception of them. They were each punished for their "crime" of being new women. Readers are led to dislike these women even though they were acting like many other women of the 1930s and even today. At the end, the author points out that we must know about the past views of women in order to understand women. 

The [Unattainable] American Dream

The American Dream is originally about finding happiness, but by the 1920s happiness only came with wealth; Americans strived for wealth because they thought that money brought happiness. However, F. Scott Fitzgerald never used the words "American Dream" in The Great Gatsby. Fitzgerald shows the difficulty of obtaining happiness through the American Dream. Fitzgerald uses motifs to demonstrate the unattainability of the American Dream.
One of the main motifs of the novel are parties. Gatsby throws his extremely extravagant parties in an effort to catch Daisy's attention; hoping that she would see the lights across the bay or hear about them. His attempts however, are useless because no one really knows who Gatsby is. Many of his guests make up his past and are only there to celebrate in the 'American Dream'. The corruption in this dream is evident. Men are fighting with their wives. They are unhappy with their marriages whereas the women feel as if they are being neglected. Plus, most of the guests only show up to increase their social standings and to bask in what they believe is the American Dream. These guests who feign their friendships with Gatsby do not show up for his funeral, which only exemplifies the corruption and superficiality of the American Dream.
Also, Gatsby's sole purpose for throwing these parties is to please Daisy, however she is not impressed by them. This demonstrates the impossibility of Gatsby attaining his American Dream (being with Daisy AND still having his wealth).
Overall, The Great Gatsby uses the party motif to show that there wasn't really an American Dream. The American Dream was perceived as having wealth and not really about true happiness. Wealth was thought to bring happiness, however, we should all know that money does not bring happiness.

History and Innocence

This week in class we read a poem called "The History Teacher" by Billy Collins. This poem really stood out to me because this teacher whom all the students look up to for answers and the truth is lying to them. He was giving them information about wars and time periods that were completely false. However, when I read it I didn't think of it as lying. Although he was being naive, he was only trying to protect what innocence was left in the world. The children, however, have already lost their innocence, "...[leaving] his classroom for the playground to torment the weak and the smart...", they have already been exposed to the cruelty in our world. This is what the teacher was trying to protect them from. This poem showed an ideal world: where everyone is able to maintain their innocence without being exposed to inhumanity. I think that Billy Collins was trying to say that we see the world how we want to see it. The teacher saw the children's ability to stay innocent, while the speaker saw the inevitable cruelness of man. While many may disagree with me, I think the teacher was only trying to protect the kids from the dangers in the world in order to preserve their purity.

Punctuation in Today's World

In an ever-changing world, standard punctuation must be highly valued for the sake of clarity and understanding .
In Source A, Hitchings states that "deviations from the established [standard punctuation] rules seem to indicate a break from tradition". New technologies and social media appear to be reinforcing this break. For example, using marks such as the "snark" instead of the standard question mark to represent a rhetorical question. Using new punctuation can cause confusion among the many people not connected with advanced technology and social media websites. By adding new or removing "outdated" punctuation, the point of the story, essay, tweet, etc. is lost. There is no clarity in what the author is trying to convey because the reader will be concentrated on deciphering what he/she is trying to say. It is "better to use [punctuation] sparingly, and with affection" (Thomas). According to Thomas, it is better to value punctuation rather than overuse or ignore it. Change is inevitable, the rules of punctuation are bound to change. In her poem, Austen demonstrates that punctuation is unnecessary to prove her point. When she says "YIPPEE" it is clear that she is exclaiming but she did not use any punctuation. Punctuation is not a necessity in writing, however, the highly valued use of punctuation creates clarity and understanding in writing.